Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Scruggs v. Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 2:2015cv02026
Plaintiff:
Wendell Scruggs
Defendant:
Memphis Police Dept and Shelby County Sheriff's Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scruggs v. Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 3:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
Wendell Scruggs
Defendant:
Memphis Police Dept. and Shelby County Sheriffs Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 2:2014cv02930
Plaintiff:
Armando Q. Anderson
Defendant:
Memphis Police Dept., City of Memphis, J. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFarland v. Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 2:2014cv02891
Plaintiff:
Efrem Z. McFarland, Jr.
Defendant:
Memphis Police Dept., Tony Armstrong, Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 2:2014cv02750
Plaintiff:
Timothy Emmanuel Johnson
Defendant:
Memphis Police Dept., J. Johnson, D. Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayers v. Boyd et al
as 3:2014cv01560
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Mayers
Defendant:
Joey Boyd, Ronnie Williams, Bob Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Rogersville City Police Dept. et al
as 2:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Martin Hughes
Defendant:
Rogersville City Police Dept., Joey Maddox and Charles Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McComsey v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2014cv01291
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey McComsey
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Jeff Williams, Metro Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Rogersville City Police Dept. et al
as 3:2014cv01224
Plaintiff:
Martin Hughes
Defendant:
Rogersville City Police Dept., Joey Maddox and Charles Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Young et al
as 2:2014cv02321
Plaintiff:
Tavarius Jones
Defendant:
Grant Young, Kevin Martin, Gary Rikard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
