Cases 31 - 40 of 355
PRESLEY v. GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
GEORGE PRESLEY
Defendant:
GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, LLOYD J SPICKARD, STEPHANIE DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUTCHLEY v. ADDISON et al
as 7:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ADDISON, SERGEANT CLARK and SHERIFF RAY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00203
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. Bennett et al
as 5:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Alphonse Johnson
Defendant:
Ramsey Bennett, Kelvin Britt, Robert Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Geo Secure Services et al
as 1:2022cv01420
Plaintiff:
Arthur Antonio Johnson
Defendant:
Geo Secure Services, D. Bryne, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 5:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Devante Rains
Defendant:
Warden Brian Coleman, Ray Odum, Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Hays State Prison et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Hays State Prison and Joshauh Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTLEDGE v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2021cv05059
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RAY RUTLEDGE
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wagner v. Owens
as 1:2021cv04881
Petitioner:
Rekwane Shevell Wagner, Sr. and Ray Wagner
Respondent:
Sheriff Craig D. Owens, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James v. Moore et al
as 4:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
Judge William T. Moore, Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray and Dist. Court Clerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
