Cases 31 - 40 of 130
Price v. Remsen et al
as 4:2019cv00089
Plaintiff:
Arttie Price
Defendant:
Chris Reed and Ryan Remsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sireci v. Chatham County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2019cv00066
Defendant:
Cot Gibbson, Officer Walker, Pvt Mack and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Nathanial Sireci and Jacob Nathanial Sireci UCC 1-207; UCC 1-308; UCC 3-305; UCC 3-505; UCC 3-408 doing business as Ex Rel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2019cv00034
Defendant:
JERRY REED, NORMAE BEECHAM, Warden H DWIGHT HAMRICK and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE EDWARD JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burrows v. Yeager et al
as 3:2017cv00110
Defendant:
Corporal Anthony Cox, Sergeant Eric Smith, Detention Officer Fowler and others
Plaintiff:
William Maurice Burrows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Reed et al
as 1:2018cv04784
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Randy Reed and Warden Kevin Sprayberry
Plaintiff:
Randy Jenkins Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Toole et al
as 1:2018cv03970
Respondent:
Robert Toole, Marty Allen and Warden
Petitioner:
Mark Rudolph Arsenio Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reid v. Crickmar et al
as 4:2018cv00168
Defendant:
Scott Crickmar, Patti Sneed, Belinda Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Travion Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheerer v. Moody et al
as 1:2018cv03267
Defendant:
Naphcare Medical, Officer Reed, Officer Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Dominick Francis Sheerer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. WOODS et al
as 7:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
ERIC REED
Defendant:
SHUNDA WOODS, HEATHER A DAVIS, LESLIE PLUGGEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fair v. Reed et al
as 1:2018cv00104
Plaintiff:
Tony A. Fair, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Reed, FNU Washington, Lieutenant Shift-Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
