Cases 31 - 40 of 221
Custer v. Owens et al
as 1:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Russell Owens, Diane Powers, . Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Watkins et al
as 1:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Chris Watkins, Cameesha Turner, Brad Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. Fayette County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv03085
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dale Eaton
Defendant:
Fayette County Jail, Matt McConkey, David Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01447
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, Russell Owen, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Melchor et al
as 1:2022cv01423
Plaintiff:
Rochelle McCray
Defendant:
Hector Melchor, Stephen Brown, Kerri Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. McConkey et al
as 3:2022cv02722
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dale Eaton
Defendant:
Matt McConkey, David Russell, Amber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. McConkey et al
as 3:2022cv03253
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dale Eaton
Defendant:
Matt McConkey, David Russell, . Amber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Melchor et al
as 1:2022cv01394
Plaintiff:
Tony L Robinson
Defendant:
Hector Melchor, Kerri Johnson, Mathew Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv05601
Plaintiff:
Mickey Russell
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County Jail, Cook County Shiff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. Chacon et al
as 2:2022cv02201
Plaintiff:
Russell A Reeves
Defendant:
Jennifer Chacon and Dr. Ek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
