Cases 31 - 40 of 1,317
Wilson v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Gregory Scott
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Higgins et al
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Defendant:
District Attorney Kelly Higgins and District Attorney Jennifer Feldman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Andrede et al
as 5:2023cv01558
Plaintiff:
Phillip Garland Scott and Scott, P. Garland
Defendant:
Ofc. FNU Andrede and Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Unknown et al
as 6:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Unknown and Captain Unknown Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Unknown et al
as 5:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Unknown and Captain Unknown Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04553
Petitioner:
Scott Michael Roberts
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shakouri v. Becker et al
as 1:2023cv01479
Plaintiff:
Shahram Shakouri
Defendant:
Scott Becker, John Rolater, Jennifer Edgeworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
