Cases 31 - 40 of 879
Ismail Mora v. E. Sanchez et al
as 2:2023cv09635
Plaintiff:
Ismail Mora
Defendant:
E. Sanchez, R. Roque, B. Garfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rayshivers v. Luiz et al
as 1:2023cv01535
Plaintiff:
Tommy Rayshivers
Defendant:
Luiz and Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rojas v. Gates et al
as 1:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Eric A. Rojas
Defendant:
Gates, Harris, Tirado-Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bustillos v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Robert John Bustillos
Defendant:
Hernandez, Cabrillo, Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cesar Ivan Sanchez-Gaytan v. J. Doerer
as 2:2023cv07706
Petitioner:
Cesar Ivan Sanchez-Gaytan
Respondent:
J. Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Haines v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2023cv04452
Plaintiff:
Joey Haines
Defendant:
Sheriff Sanchez, Deputy Krause, Deputy Trigueros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ndandu v. Alvarado et al
as 3:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Tresor Maleka Ndandu
Defendant:
Alvarado, Almager, A. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanchez v. Martinez et al
as 3:2023cv01561
Petitioner:
Nakunta Sanchez
Respondent:
Kelly Martinez and The Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01677
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01446
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
