Cases 31 - 40 of 55
(PC) Loguidice v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
as 1:2018cv01652
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Care Services and Rich
Plaintiff:
Thomas Loguidice
Other:
Special Appearance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Reif et al
as 2:2018cv01088
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Cherokee Brown
Defendant:
C. Reif, S. Overby, J. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meador v. Brown et al
as 2:2018cv00696
Plaintiff:
Gordon Dale Meador
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Scott Kernan, 33 Wardens throughout CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Buren v. Parriott, et al.
as 1:2017cv00893
Plaintiff:
Irvin Van Buren
Defendant:
B L Parriott, T. Higgins and Special Appearance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings v. Peterson et al
as 2:2017cv01174
Plaintiff:
David T. Cummings
Defendant:
Carla Peterson, T. Oloyede, M. Felder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Sierra v. Director for the Dept of Corr, et al
as 17-16055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH A. SIERRA
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, JENNIFER BERETTO, A. ADAMS, Chief Medical Executive and others
Benjamin Toscano v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 17-16015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN K. TOSCANO
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, CDC Director and SPECIAL APPEARANCE
Harris v. Fernan et al
as 2:2017cv00680
Plaintiff:
Wayde Hollis Harris
Defendant:
S. Fernan, E. Arnold, T. Wamble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric K'napp v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-15577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Herrera v. Manish-Mggarwal
as 2:2017cv00650
Plaintiff:
Armando Herrera
Defendant:
Manish-Mggarwal and Special Appearance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
