Cases 31 - 40 of 403
Newton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv10538
Petitioner:
Faith Newton
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Marshalls and Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flete-Garcia v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10612
Plaintiff:
Fulvio Flete-Garcia
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donahue v. United State of America
as 1:2022cv10566
Petitioner:
David Donahue
Respondent:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Dolan et al
as 1:2022cv10546
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Byron Watson
Defendant:
Edward Dolan
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fusco v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv40035
Petitioner:
Emilio Fusco
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10401
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Newton v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10333
Petitioner:
Faith Newton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lard Sr. v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10087
Petitioner:
Ellis Jerome Lard Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boston v. State of Massachusetts
as 1:2021cv12101
Petitioner:
Craig Augustine Boston
Respondent:
State of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lard v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv11511
Petitioner:
Ellis J Lard
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
