Cases 31 - 40 of 600
Revilla v. State of Ohio
as 2:2023cv00749
Petitioner:
Julian Revilla
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sotelo v. NERC State of Ohio
as 1:2023cv00359
Petitioner:
Selena Sotelo
Respondent:
NERC State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Varlonus James
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections and State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Manning v. State of Ohio et al
as 3:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Paul Manning
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Lucas County, James Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davenport et al v. The State of Ohio et al
as 2:2022cv04419
Plaintiff:
Carlos Davenport and United States Of America
Defendant:
The State of Ohio and Franklin County of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. The State Of Ohio
as 2:2022cv04423
Petitioner:
Howard E. Martin, III
Respondent:
The State Of Ohio and Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Ohio/City of Oregon v. Belmon
as 3:2022cv02246
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio/City of Oregon
Defendant:
DeAnde L. Belmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Francis v. Roberts et al
as 1:2022cv00743
Plaintiff:
Mary E Francis
Defendant:
Captain Roberts, Scioto County Jail, State of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Attorney General for the State of Ohio
as 3:2022cv00352
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Ohio v. Watson
as 1:2022cv00707
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio
Defendant:
Michael Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
