Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Burton v. Hartley et al
as 1:2009cv02560
Petitioner:
Ta'Rell Lavar Burton
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ries v. Hartley et al
as 1:2009cv02522
Petitioner:
Jack Raymond Ries
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allsup v. Hartley et al
as 1:2009cv02362
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Claude Allsup
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waddles v. Hartley et al
as 1:2009cv02225
Petitioner:
Billy Ray Waddles
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ankeney v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv02085
Plaintiff:
Randal Ankeney
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Steve Hartley, Tim Creany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troke v. Hartley et al
as 1:2009cv01413
Petitioner:
Daniel Scot Troke
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lefthandbull v. Hartley et al
as 1:2009cv01345
Plaintiff:
Ralph Lefthandbull
Defendant:
Steve Hartley, R. Steinbeck, Reavor Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinn v. Hartley
as 1:2009cv00694
Petitioner:
Robert H. Quinn, III
Respondent:
Steve Hartley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jesso v. Hartley
as 1:2009cv00510
Petitioner:
Michael A. Jesso
Respondent:
Steve Hartley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brim v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv00429
Petitioner:
Ernest Brim
Respondent:
Aristedes Zavaras, Steve Hartley, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.