Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Taylor v. Sabol et al
as 4:2007cv40212
Petitioner:
Macdonald P. Taylor
Respondent:
Carolyn Sabol, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Sabol
as 4:2007cv40196
Petitioner:
Derrick Taylor
Respondent:
Carolyn Sabol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Anna Jacques Hospital Psych Ward
as 1:2007cv10932
Plaintiff:
Nathan D.L.J. Taylor
Defendant:
Anna Jacques Hospital Psych Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Taylor v. Umass Amherst
as 1:2007cv10938
Plaintiff:
Nathan D.L.J. Taylor
Defendant:
Umass Amherst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Taylor v. Tewksbury State Mental Hospital
as 1:2007cv10933
Plaintiff:
Nathan D.L.J. Taylor
Defendant:
Tewksbury State Mental Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Nathan D.L.J. Taylor v. Caritas Holy Family
as 1:2007cv10936
Defendant:
Caritas Holy Family Health Center
Plaintiff:
Nathan D.L.J. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Taylor v. Park Ambulance Service, Inc.
as 1:2007cv10937
Plaintiff:
Nathan D.L.J. Taylor
Defendant:
Park Ambulance Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Taylor v. New York Presbyterian Hospital
as 1:2007cv10931
Plaintiff:
Nathan D.L.J. Taylor
Defendant:
New York Presbyterian Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Taylor v. Ramos
as 1:2007cv10657
Plaintiff:
Terence Taylor
Defendant:
Jeanette Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Taylor v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 1:2007cv10399
Plaintiff:
Nathan D.L.J. Taylor
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
