Cases 31 - 40 of 153
Brooks v. George County Regional Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2019cv00361
Defendant:
Terry Rodgers, George County Regional Correctional Facility and Bobby Fairley
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Brooks
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. USA
as 3:2019cv00123
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terry Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Butler v. Hinds County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2019cv00239
Plaintiff:
Terry Dewayne Butler
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors and Hinds County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Havard et al
as 1:2019cv00024
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Christy Unknown, Derrick Eubanks, Terry Rodgers and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Keith Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinkston v. Hall et al
as 5:2018cv00103
Defendant:
Larry Lee, Jerry Williams, C/O C. Hughey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Chaz D. Pinkston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Sheriff et al
as 3:2018cv00564
Defendant:
Prosecutor Mary Cotton, Judge Benny K. Warrington, Sheriff Investigator Terry Gann and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wooten v. Turner et al
as 4:2018cv00171
Defendant:
Marshall Turner, Carl McCool, Kenji Terry and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lennell Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Swilley v. Swilley et al
as 3:2018cv00506
Defendant:
Byron Swilley, Terry Wallace and Terrell Davis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Swilley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. Turner et al
as 4:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lennell Wooten
Defendant:
Marshall Turner, Timothy Morris, Kenji Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Gann et al
as 3:2018cv00410
Plaintiff:
Richard Baker
Defendant:
Terry Gann and Jacob Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
