Cases 31 - 40 of 337
Woods v. State of Minnesota Corporate Courts
as 0:2023cv01544
Petitioner:
Alan Woods
Respondent:
State of Minnesota Corporate Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buomkuoth Well v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 23-2212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Buomkuoth Gatluak Puot Well
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota, Fifth Judicial District, Christopher Rovney and others
Bruce Partridge v. State of Minn. Beltrami County, et al
as 23-2092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bruce Partridge
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota Beltrami County, Beltrami County, City of Bemidji and others
Tony Jackson v. Steve Simon, et al
as 23-1832
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony D. Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Simon, State of Minnesota Secretary of State and Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Corrections
Jason Hill v. State of Minnesota
as 23-1782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason Robert Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota
Lenear v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2023cv00842
Petitioner:
Eddie Lenear
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tim Dortch v. State of Minnesota
as 23-1564
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tim Davin Dortch
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and State of Minnesota
VanVickle v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2023cv00618
Petitioner:
Douglas VanVickle
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce Partridge v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 23-1446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bruce Partridge
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota, Beltrami County, Beltrami County Sheriff's Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
