Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Jesse Tiedeman v. Douglas Weber, et al
as 14-3310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jesse Claude Tiedeman
Defendant - Appellee:
Douglas L. Weber, Director of Prison Operations at South Dakota State Penitentiary, Troy Ponto, Assoc. Warden, Clifton Fantroy, Unit Manager and others
Scheetz v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2013cv04144
Plaintiff:
Daryl Scheetz
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Darren Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiedeman v. Weber et al
as 4:2013cv04126
Plaintiff:
Jesse C. Tiedeman
Defendant:
Douglas L. Weber, Troy Ponto, Clifton Fantroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strohfus v. Bowers et al
as 4:2013cv04067
Plaintiff:
Toby Joseph Strohfus
Defendant:
Heather Bowers, Douglas Weber, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gard v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2013cv04062
Plaintiff:
Rex Gard
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Doug Weber, Bob Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Two Eagle v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04014
Plaintiff:
Lynn Two Eagle
Defendant:
Douglas Weber, Cliff Fantroy, Troy Ponto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Cody v. Douglas Loen, et al
as 11-2450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William R. Cody
Defendant - Appellee:
Douglas T. Loen, Derrick Bieber, Dennis Block and others
Young v. South Dakota Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2009cv04180
Plaintiff:
Joseph Paul Young
Defendant:
South Dakota Department of Corrections, Troy Ponto and Tomas Linnewebber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cody v. Loen et al
as 4:2009cv04169
Plaintiff:
William Cody
Defendant:
Douglas Loen, Derrick Bieber, Dennis Block and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doop v. Weber et al
as 4:2009cv04158
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doop
Defendant:
Douglas L. Weber, South Dakota Department of Corrections, Jenny Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
