Cases 31 - 40 of 81
French v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 2:2015cv02294
Defendant:
Angie E. Cecil and U.S. Dept of Justice
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
French v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 2:2015cv02293
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Defendant:
James G. Toultey and U.S. Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 2:2015cv02290
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Defendant:
Charles J. Marvray and U.S. Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 2:2015cv02291
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Defendant:
Elijah F. Jenkins and U.S. Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 2:2015cv02289
Defendant:
F.O.I.A., Jim Kovatios and U.S. Dept of Justice
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 2:2015cv02292
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Defendant:
Jonathan M. Smith and U.S. Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv02414
Petitioner:
Jermaine T. May
Respondent:
United States of America and U.S. Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frazier v. Wilcox et al
as 1:2015cv02265
Plaintiff:
Jason Frazier
Defendant:
Donald Wilcox, Jessica Seaton, Theresa Cozza-Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchins v. Jacoby & Meyers et al
as 1:2015cv07510
Plaintiff:
Barry Hutchins
Defendant:
Jacoby & Meyers, Cochran Firm, Joshua Bernstien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson, et al v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, et al
as 15-1229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON and MIKEAL G. STINE
Plaintiff:
LEROY BUHL
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DIGNAM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
