Cases 31 - 40 of 256
Brenizer v. USA
as 0:2023cv01216
Petitioner:
Kyle William Brenizer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Latimer v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Mark Latimer
Defendant:
Paul Schnell and William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 0:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B. Ellis, Jim M. GreenLee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Beltz et al
as 0:2023cv00205
Petitioner:
William Joseph Sullivan
Respondent:
Tracey Beltz and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odneal v. Schnell et al
as 0:2022cv03107
Plaintiff:
Shawn K. Odneal
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Guy Bosch, Marrisa Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. Pugh
as 0:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
William Cleveland Alan Boykin
Respondent:
Jessie Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McInnis v. Bolin
as 0:2022cv03064
Plaintiff:
Jquan Leearthur McInnis
Defendant:
Warden William Bolin and William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Faul v. Lejeune
as 0:2022cv02993
Petitioner:
Scott William Faul
Respondent:
Michel Lejeune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spencer v. Williams
as 0:2022cv03195
Petitioner:
Demetrius Demarco Spencer
Respondent:
Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Rardin et al
as 0:2022cv02854
Petitioner:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Jared Rardin, Merrick Garland and Colett S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
