Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Payne-Bey v. Price et al
as 2:2013cv01589
Plaintiff:
Darrow Payne-Bey
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Price, et al
as 2:2013cv01588
Plaintiff:
Chalmus Wright
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Price et al
as 2:2013cv01575
Plaintiff:
Bobby Carter
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McConico v. Price et al
as 2:2013cv01560
Plaintiff:
James McConico
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Price et al
as 2:2013cv01547
Plaintiff:
Robert C Gill
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driskell v. Price et al
as 2:2013cv01541
Plaintiff:
Carrol Driskell
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swiney v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2012cv03575
Petitioner:
Jack Lloyd Swiney
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seals v. Alabama, State of et al
as 5:2012cv02751
Plaintiff:
Gary Seals, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Department of Corrections, Jerrydean Cunningham and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Arrington et al
as 2:2012cv02723
Petitioner:
Johnson Powell
Respondent:
Lloyd Arrington and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Broadhead v. Hicks et al
as 2:2012cv02369
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Lloyd Hicks, James Weaver, A Davis and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
