Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Boyd v. Leffler et al
as 1:2015cv01550
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M Boyd
Defendant:
Leffler, Brown, Gallinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormack et al v. Wall et al
as 1:2015cv00891
Petitioner:
Alan David McCormack, Toran D Brooks, Theodore J Chambers and others
Respondent:
Edward F Wall , Kathleen Nagle, Tina R Virgil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carter, Jackie v. Green, James et al
as 3:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
Jackie Carter
Defendant:
James Green , Edward Wall, Micheal Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodvine, Christopher v. Meisner, Michael et al
as 3:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goodvine
Defendant:
Michael Meisner , Michael Dittman , Sandra Hautamaki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perrault, Ronald v. Department of Corrections State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2015cv00144
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Perrault
Defendant:
Department of Corrections State of Wisconsin , Jeff Pugh, Dan Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Meli et al
as 1:2014cv00702
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Defendant:
Tony Meli , Mr Wood, Mr Sabish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green, Damien v. Laurent, Dawn et al
as 3:2014cv00326
Plaintiff:
Damien Green
Defendant:
Dawn M. Laurent , Karan Anderson, Myier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodvine, Christopher v. Meisner, Michael et al
as 3:2014cv00278
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Davis II
Defendant:
Michael Meisner , Scott Walker , Gary Ankarlo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv00164
Petitioner:
Oneal Woods
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Woods v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv00163
Petitioner:
Oneal Woods
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
