Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Oklahoma
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,868
McKinney v. Waters et al
as 6:2024cv00169
Plaintiff: Jester Cole McKinney
Defendant: Kyle Waters, Stacy Slaughter and Sequoyah County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00486
Petitioner: DeMaurea Davis
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Wright
as 5:2024cv00482
Plaintiff: Jason Michael Smith
Defendant: FNU Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff: Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant: Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00487
Plaintiff: Edford Ray Nolan, Jr
Defendant: Bradley Davis and Enid Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00480
Petitioner: Bryan Frank Perry
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Drummond
as 4:2024cv00222
Petitioner: Thomas Allen Moore
Respondent: Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swan v. Friot
as 5:2024cv00475
Petitioner: John Miguel Swan
Respondent: Stephen P Friot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Christensen v. Amonson et al
as 5:2024cv00479
Plaintiff: John E Christensen
Defendant: Chris Amonson and Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buckner v. Eastern Oklahoma District Court Sequoyah County We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00166
Plaintiff: Dwayne Eddy Buckner
Defendant: Eastern Oklahoma District Court Sequoyah County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?