Cases 31 - 40 of 397
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamdo v. Rivera et al
as 5:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Morhaf Hamdo
Defendant:
FNU Rivera, FNU Higgins, DC Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Cole
as 5:2023cv00489
Petitioner:
Bryan Ross
Respondent:
Warden D. C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Cole
as 5:2023cv00463
Petitioner:
Joseph Macastle Jackson
Respondent:
D. C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hopper v. Nix et al
as 4:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Keith D Hopper
Defendant:
Ashley Nix, Tanya Wilson, Loretta Radford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamieson v. Louthan
as 5:2023cv00211
Petitioner:
Jeremiah D Jamieson
Respondent:
David Louthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonard v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
Don D Leonard
Respondent:
Scott Crow and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manning v. Core Civic et al
as 5:2023cv00137
Defendant:
Kimberly Sullivan, Core Civic, Cimarron Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Reco D Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bray v. Pontotoc County Justice Center et al
as 6:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jeromy D. Bray
Defendant:
Pontotoc County Justice Center, John Christian, Turnkey Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magness v. Pettigrew
as 6:2022cv00376
Petitioner:
Michael D. Magness
Respondent:
Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
