Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 31 - 40 of 39,634
DOUGLAS v. AMMONS
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff: MELISSA A DOUGLAS
Defendant: Judge G WAYNE AMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. AMANDA et al
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: JOHNATHAN EDWARD BROWN
Defendant: AMANDA, WALKER, DENISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff: KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant: Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and Captain GLENDA HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Hereditary Native American Seminole War Chieftain
as 1:2024cv01210
Petitioner: Chief-King; Mr. Ne'Guerian Simone Wright
Respondent: Hereditary Native American Seminole War Chieftain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Sheriff Bobb
as 1:2024cv02124
Petitioner: Timothy A. Thomas
Respondent: Sheriff Bobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillian v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02121
Petitioner: Christopher McMillian
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Savalli v. Gulledge
as 4:2024cv00129
Petitioner: Ryan Douglas Savalli
Respondent: Sheriff Gary Gulledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02096
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Garcia v. Henson
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff: Ruben Garcia
Defendant: Officer J. Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NelNet Program et al v. Dooley
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff: NelNet Program and Antonio Deshone Dooley
Defendant: Antonio D. Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?