Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Milam v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv14057
Petitioner:
Heath Earl Milam
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milam v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv00324
Petitioner:
Heath Earl Milam
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOOBYYAA v. TUCKER, et al
as 5:2012cv00403
Plaintiff:
MANDINGO BOOBYYAA
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER, RICKY CLOUD, HEATH HOLLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Eslinger et al
as 6:2011cv01591
Plaintiff:
Oberist Lee Saunders
Defendant:
Donald Eslinger, Ronald Shaw, Luis Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Niemi v. Trinity Food Service
as 2:2010cv00468
Plaintiff:
Heath Ryan Niemi
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. United States of America
as 0:2010cv60144
Plaintiff:
Heath Howard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HEATH v MCNEIL, et al
as 1:2009cv00148
Petitioner:
Ronald Palmer Heath
Respondent:
WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v. McNeil et al
as 3:2009cv00580
Petitioner:
Ronald Palmer Heath
Respondent:
Walter A. McNeil and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Heath
as 3:2009cv00573
Plaintiff:
Omar Franklin Barnes
Defendant:
Gary A. Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Benitez et al
as 8:2009cv01099
Plaintiff:
Aaron Kane Heath
Defendant:
Eddie Benitez, Kathy J. Chin, R. Michael Cochran, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
