Cases 41 - 50 of 630
Neal v. Rodriguez et al
as 9:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jeron Neal
Defendant:
Cesar Rodriguez, Jesus M Salgado, Jr, Ty M Paredes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. Sheriffs Office LEC et al
as 7:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Donny Ray Roberts
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office LEC and Ishmaul Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Jesus-Flores v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00161
Petitioner:
Ismael De Jesus-Flores
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hernandez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01244
Petitioner:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chaney v. Ellis County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2022cv02478
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy Chaney
Defendant:
Ellis County Sheriff Office, Wellpath to hope and healing, Terry NLN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Lehmann
as 4:2022cv00932
Plaintiff:
Victor Alexander Flores
Defendant:
Melinda Lehmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Romelia Flores
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Flores v. Home Depot
as 4:2022cv00901
Plaintiff:
Victor Alexander Flores
Defendant:
Home Depot and Home Depot Employee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Garza et al
as 7:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lopez
Defendant:
Eddie Garza, Yvonne Vasquez, Hidalgo County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kozak v. Flores, et al
as 5:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Devin Michael Ty Kozak
Defendant:
Officer Jordan Flores, Parole, Security (C.O.'s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
