Cases 41 - 50 of 1,112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02549
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Baker v. Ed Gonzalez et al
as 4:2023cv04190
Plaintiff:
Frank Baker
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Detention Officer Vickers and Detention Officer Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Gonzalez
as 5:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Angel Lee Sanchez
Defendant:
Officer FNU Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilson v. Supervisor Over the Medical Department et al
as 4:2023cv04058
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Wilson
Defendant:
Supervisor Over the Medical Department, Supervisor Over the Dietary Department and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantu Vela v. Mission Texas, Police Department et al
as 7:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Horacio Cantu Vela
Defendant:
Mission Texas, Police Department, Detective Martinez and Detective Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Cruz v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03965
Petitioner:
Andrea De La Cruz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Rivera et al
as 2:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alvarado Gonzalez
Defendant:
Sheriff Oscar Rivera and Mary Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Mason et al
as 5:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Wanda Mason, Derek Hester, Rebecca McKibben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02296
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Taylor v. Dallas County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2023cv02316
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel I Taylor, Sr
Defendant:
Dallas County Sheriffs Office, NFN McGraw, NFN Thigpen and others
Interested Party:
Marian Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
