Cases 41 - 50 of 660
Williams v. Ramey et al
as 3:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Rodger E. Williams and Willow A. Williams
Defendant:
Betsy Ramey, Warden Ferguson, President of WellPath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Scott
as 1:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Ancil Junior Williams
Defendant:
Bonya Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguirre v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jesus Aguirre
Defendant:
N. Williams, Stat of Tennessee and Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Williams et al
as 5:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Justin Tyler Graham
Defendant:
Steven Williams and Anna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguirre v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Jesus Aguirre
Defendant:
N. Williams, Stat of Tennessee and Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Crall et al
as 0:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
John Larry Daniels and David W. WIlliams
Defendant:
Doug Crall, Federic Kemen, Lacy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tillie-Toler v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Richard William Tillie-Toler
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shannon et al v. Burberry et al
as 5:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon, Jeff Tucker, William Peters and others
Defendant:
West Burberry and Bourbon County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Omar S Williams
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Mabry et al
as 0:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Justin Davis
Defendant:
Judy Mabry, Latrisha Ferguson, Norah McGlone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
