Cases 41 - 50 of 397
Adams v. Illinois River Medical Staff et al
as 1:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
Kahlus Adams
Defendant:
Illinois River Medical Staff and Tiffany Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2022cv01217
Plaintiff:
Carlos Padilla, III, Everett Clinton, Keith Beard and others
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffries, Cherryl Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hasemyer et al
as 3:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
Jeramey R Brown
Defendant:
Chad Hasemyer, Jessica Huffman, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahon v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01198
Plaintiff:
Scott McMahon
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, "Jane" Ellinger, "Jane" King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
Jared R. Crawford
Defendant:
Jayson Clark, Kenny Shires, Harrisburg Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dodd et al
as 3:2022cv01013
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Rachell Dodd, Lance Ellington, J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilley v. Clark
as 3:2022cv01010
Petitioner:
Jimmy Tilley, Jr
Respondent:
Tiffany Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Clark
as 1:2022cv02226
Plaintiff:
Mark Jones
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Clark
as 2:2022cv02080
Petitioner:
Mark Jones
Respondent:
Tiffanie Clark
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Clark
as 1:2022cv01861
Petitioner:
Keith Griffin
Respondent:
Tiffanie Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
