Cases 41 - 50 of 6,485
Brodeur v. USA Government
as 1:2024cv11803
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent:
USA Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Henacho et al
as 1:2024cv11728
Defendant:
Baldwin Henacho, Ramos, NSJ Medical Provider Wellpath and others
Plaintiff:
James A Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lugo v. Fox News Local et al
as 3:2024cv30087
Plaintiff:
Luke Lugo
Defendant:
Fox News Local, Boston Herald, Somerville Journal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schoener v. Donelan, Sheriff
as 1:2024cv11750
Respondent:
Christopher J. Donelan, Sheriff
Petitioner:
Mr. Michael Schoener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schoener v. Donelan, Sheriff
as 3:2024cv11750
Respondent:
Christopher J. Donelan, Sheriff
Petitioner:
Mr. Michael Schoener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vick v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE
as 1:2024cv11757
Petitioner:
Charlie D. Vick
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dower v. George
as 1:2024cv11754
Defendant:
Plymouth Police Department and Derek George
Plaintiff:
Darius Dower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Acevedo v. Mici
as 1:2024cv11486
Respondent:
Carol Mici
Petitioner:
Angel Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunlap v. F.J Bowers
as 1:2024cv11587
Petitioner:
Cortney Dunlap
Respondent:
F.J Bowers and FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
