Cases 41 - 50 of 122
IVAN v. ANDERSON et al
as 2:2019cv13706
Respondent:
WILLIAM ANDERSON
Petitioner:
GUARTAN YADAICELA WALTE IVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ESPICHAN v. ANDERSON
as 2:2019cv13032
Petitioner:
NICOLA ARTURO ESPICHAN
Respondent:
WILLIAM J. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AZOUKI v. BARR et al
as 2:2019cv12468
Petitioner:
Charbel Azouki
Respondent:
Attorney General USA William Barr, Kevin McAleenan, WILLIAM BARR and others
Defendant:
Matthew Albence and William Anderson
ANDERSON v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv13931
Defendant:
PEPPER, WILLIE BONDS, HIGGINS and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEFFRIES v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2018cv01146
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JEFFRIES
Defendant:
DAVID ORTIZ, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, PENA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KING v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv07233
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON KING
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2017cv06759
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, REYES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLADGER v. STEM et al
as 2:2017cv03289
Plaintiff:
CHAPPELL T FLADGER
Defendant:
ERICA STEM, MERRILL MAIN, V BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIZZARELLI v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2017cv02903
Petitioner:
ANGELA PIZZARELLI
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIAM ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AQUILINA v. ANDERSON et al
as 2:2017cv02243
Petitioner:
DEBRA ANN AQUILINA
Respondent:
WILLIAM ANDERSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
