Cases 41 - 50 of 298
Beasley v. T. Peyton, et al.
as 1:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Walter Ray Beasley
Defendant:
T. Peyton, Larry Leabough, Mark Culver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Jones v. Frost et al
as 7:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Trevor Andrew Jones
Defendant:
Barbara Frost, Michael Berry, D. Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Campbell County Commonwealth Attorney's Office
as 7:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Andre Lamont Andrews
Defendant:
Campbell County Commonwealth Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Smoot et al
as 7:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Pres Huffman
Defendant:
Cindi L. Smoot and Wise County Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 7:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Reed v. Michael, et al. et al
as 3:2023cv00100
Defendant:
Michael, et al., Mike, Phillip Cornelious and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Bonferraro
as 7:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Andre Lamont Andrews
Defendant:
Bonferraro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Perry et al
as 7:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Edward's, Jr. and Ronald Gene Edwards
Defendant:
Lane Perry, Officer Barker and Andrew Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Lynchburg General District Court
as 7:2022cv00598
Plaintiff:
Andre Lamont Andrews
Defendant:
Lynchburg General District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Arlington County Clerk et al
as 3:2022cv00640
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Taylor
Defendant:
Arlington County Clerk, Register of Deeds, Wegmans Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
