Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Washington v. Columbia County Prison et al
as 3:2010cv00045
Plaintiff:
Malek Washington
Defendant:
Columbia County Prison, William Campbell, Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Campbell et al
as 4:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cunningham
Defendant:
William Campbell, Columbia County Prison and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayfield v. Columbia County Prison et al
as 4:2010cv00020
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Mayfield
Defendant:
Columbia County Prison, William Campbell, CO Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Columbia County Prison et al
as 4:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Keven Sullivan
Defendant:
Columbia County Prison, William Campbell, CO Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. ARAMARK
as 2:2009cv06024
Plaintiff:
ALAN J. CARTER, JR.
Defendant:
ARAMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Bennett et al
as 4:2009cv02175
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thompson
Defendant:
Ed Bennett, Ruth Rush, Kathy Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SALMON v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv03734
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JAMES SALMON
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SALMON v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv03556
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JAMES SALMON
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2009cv01889
Plaintiff:
JASON GONZALEZ
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE DEPT., ET AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. COMMISSIONER OF P.P.S. et al
as 2:2009cv00623
Plaintiff:
KAMALIF WHITE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF P.P.S., ARAMARK ADMINISTRATION and MEDICAL ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
