Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Diaz v. N.Y.C. Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2014cv06592
Plaintiff:
Arnold Diaz
Defendant:
N.Y.C. Department of Corrections and Rikers Island Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fann v. Arnold et al
as 6:2014cv06187
Petitioner:
Jermaine Fann
Respondent:
Nurse Arnold, Nurse Stern and Dr. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rahman v. Schriro et al
as 7:2013cv06095
Plaintiff:
Esteban Herrera, Sean Smith, Malik Rahman and others
Defendant:
Commissioner Dora Schriro, Warden Luis Rivera, Deputy Warden Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Palines et al
as 1:2013cv05179
Plaintiff:
Arnold Cruz
Defendant:
Julie Palines and Eric Palines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. VCBC Prision Health Services et al
as 1:2013cv02563
Plaintiff:
Arnold M. Cruz
Defendant:
VCBC Prision Health Services, A.M.K.C. Prision Health Services and Jean Richard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. VCBC Prision Health Services et al
as 7:2013cv02563
Plaintiff:
Arnold M. Cruz
Defendant:
VCBC Prision Health Services, A.M.K.C. Prision Health Services and Jean Richard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Kemp et al
as 6:2013cv06173
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Dixon
Defendant:
Dennis R. Kemp, Jeffery T. Arnold, Brooks T. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mckelvey v. Fischer et al
as 9:2012cv00094
Plaintiff:
Arnold Mckelvey
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Cris Nunez and Barbini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00272
Plaintiff:
Arnold Reeves
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Mckelvey v. Fischer et al
as 1:2011cv09667
Plaintiff:
Arnold Mckelvey
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Cris Nunez and Barbini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
