Cases 41 - 50 of 78
George v. USA
as 3:2018cv00005
Petitioner:
Adam James George
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Freeman v. Multnomah County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2017cv01893
Defendant:
Deputy Beauseau, Deputy Croteaw, Deputy Fray and others
Plaintiff:
Sheik Shareef Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steltz v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2017cv01857
Respondent:
Marion County and State of Oregon
Petitioner:
Adam Steltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKnight v. Kolberg et al
as 2:2017cv01344
Defendant:
ADA Adam Gibb, Judge Michael Greenlick, ADA Dave Hannon and others
Plaintiff:
Tim McKnight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steltz v. Raley et al
as 6:2017cv00603
Defendant:
Claudia Burton, William Labthrop and Kim Raley
Plaintiff:
Adam Troy Steltz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. Jones et al
as 2:2017cv00178
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Matthew Barba, Jason Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Fifer et al
as 6:2016cv02044
Plaintiff:
Adam Steven Anderson
Defendant:
John Battle, Chris Bedsaul, Dan Buckwald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soria v. Sandler
as 6:2016cv00203
Defendant:
Adams Sandler
Plaintiff:
Peter Alexander Soria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rains v. Edwards et al
as 3:2015cv00915
Defendant:
Dr. Adams, Dan Berger, Dr. Buckler and others
Plaintiff:
John Rains
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bitter v. Premo
as 6:2015cv00396
Petitioner:
Scott Adam Bitter
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
