Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Trail v. Woodrum et al
as 3:2020cv03076
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Amy Woodrum, County of Logan and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Trail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholas v. County of Logan et al
as 3:2020cv03069
Defendant:
County of Logan, Mark Landers, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Jason Nicholas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nicholas v. Logan County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv03066
Plaintiff:
Richard J Nicholas
Defendant:
Logan County Jail, Mark Landers, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nicholas v. County of Logan et al
as 3:2020cv03056
Defendant:
County of Logan, Mark Landers, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Jason Nicholas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Kettelkamp et al
as 3:2020cv03036
Defendant:
Rohn Burke, Christian County, Mary Dambacher and others
Plaintiff:
Markes N Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stubbs v. Clague et al
as 4:2019cv04217
Defendant:
David Clague, Jane Doe, Brad Abernathy and others
Plaintiff:
Justin T Stubbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lytle v. Clague et al
as 4:2019cv04209
Defendant:
David Clague, Tracy Burgard, Brad Abernathy and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lytle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Terrill et al
as 4:2019cv04205
Defendant:
Tracy Burgard, Joe Olsen, David Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faine v. Barr et al
as 3:2019cv03009
Defendant:
NP Mary Dambacher, Hughes Louchard, Wesley L Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Faine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Montgomery County Jail/Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2018cv03280
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail/Sheriff's Department, Erin Mattson, Montgomery County Public Defender's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
