Cases 41 - 50 of 66
David Ramirez v. Sheriff Deputy Rashford, et al
as 11-56037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RAMIREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RASHFORD, MARQUEZ, BOTTOMLY and others
DANG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2011cv02410
Petitioner:
LAN DANG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Donald Glass v. A. Scribner, et al
as 11-15109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GLASS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. K. SCRIBNER, K. Anderson C. Espinoza M. Randolph F. Fuhldort F. Lieutenant M. Seifert W. Villarreal L. wood J. Yates D. Ortiz D. Zavala C/O Henderson Weber L. Brock J. Buckley V. Castillo D. Means B. Steeter, D. BAILY, D. BEEBE and others
Dang v. Holt
as 1:2011cv00064
Petitioner:
Lan Dang
Respondent:
Ronnie Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tran Minh v. Guy Hall
as 10-35469
Petitioner - Appellant:
TRAN DANG MINH
Respondent - Appellee:
GUY HALL
Chanh Dang v. G. Giurbino
as 10-55706
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHANH MINH DANG
Respondent - Appellee:
G. J. GIURBINO, Warden, Centinela State Prison, Substituted for Sylvia Garcia, Substituted for Acting Warden Stuart Ryan, Substituted for Silvia Garcia
Dang et al v. St. Charles Parish Jail
as 2:2010cv01021
Plaintiff:
Lam Dang
Defendant:
St. Charles Parish Jail
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DANG v. DO
as 2:2010cv01234
Plaintiff:
XUAN LAN DANG
Defendant:
ANTHONY DO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Glass v. A. Scribner, et al
as 09-17450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GLASS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. K. SCRIBNER, K. ANDERSON, C. ESPINOZA and others
John Stewart v. King County Jail, et al
as 09-35900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. STEWART
Defendant:
KING COUNTY JAIL
Defendant - Appellee:
KING COUNTY, REED HOLTGEERTS, Jail Director, DAVID FLEMING, Director of Public Health and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
