Cases 41 - 50 of 1,646
Williams v. Bishop et al
as 8:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Xavier T. Williams
Defendant:
Michael B. Bishop, Marcus J. Bailey, Steven D. Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murzike v. McKinney et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
B. McKinney, Officer Burnette, Secules and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Jay et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
B. Jay, M. Germaine, K. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harpo-Brown v. FNU et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Defendant:
Gunther FNU, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier, Kelvin v. Esson et al
as 2:2024cv14019
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Frazier
Defendant:
S. Esson, R. Byner, D. Hawley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Babers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lake County)
as 5:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Norman B Babers
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Peete et al
as 9:2024cv80026
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Robinson
Defendant:
Sergeant Jermesha Peete, Sergeant Patrick Karwoski, Sheriff Ric L. Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
HEARD v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
DOYLE L HEARD
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY B MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MONTALVO v. LACKY et al
as 5:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
EFRAIM MONTALVO
Defendant:
LACKY, L BENTLEY, L BRASFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
