Cases 41 - 50 of 145
RUFUS v. STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
as 3:2018cv00111
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent:
STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roller v. Mills et al
as 1:2018cv03242
Respondent:
Braxton Cotton, Jacqueline Bunn, Terry Barnard and others
Petitioner:
Jackie Ray Roller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Merilien v. Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles
as 1:2018cv03241
Defendant:
Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles
Plaintiff:
Jean Jocelyn Merilien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. The State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2018cv00770
Plaintiff:
Segral Seville Watkins
Defendant:
The State Board of Pardons and Paroles, James W. Mills, Braxton T. Cotton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarke v. Dozier et al
as 1:2017cv03803
Petitioner:
Jerome Clarke
Respondent:
Gregory C. Dozier, Antoine Caldwell, Terry E. Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin v. JIMMY AUTRY STATE PRISON, et al
as 1:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
IMARE' FRANKLIN
Defendant:
JIMMY AUTRY STATE PRISON, WALTER BERRY, BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BAKER v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2017cv00263
Petitioner:
RODERICK DOUGLASS BAKER
Respondent:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY E BARNARD, NATHAN DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2017cv00249
Plaintiff:
KURTIS LEE BROWN
Defendant:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY L BARNARD, JAMES MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00037
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
