Cases 41 - 50 of 154
BANKS v. INCH
as 3:2020cv05657
Respondent:
MARK S INCH and JAMES GILL
Petitioner:
ANTOINE TYSHAWN BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gadson v. Labarga et al
as 9:2020cv81067
Defendant:
Chief Financial Banking, The State of Florida, Jorge Labarga and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Gadson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swain v. Fidelity Bank et al
as 6:2020cv01182
Defendant:
Fidelity Bank, Regions Bank and US Courthouse Staff
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Swain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00448
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez et al v. Trump et al
as 6:2020cv01108
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Antonio Lopez, Jr. and Lori Luaghlin
Defendant:
Department of Education, Donald Trump, Federal Reserve Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00163
Petitioner:
Donald L. Banks
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Orange County)
as 6:2020cv00038
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Bradford Banks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2019cv01892
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Bradford Banks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
