Cases 41 - 50 of 296
Brown v. Fender
as 4:2022cv01284
Petitioner:
Spencer Brown
Respondent:
Warden Douglas A. Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Padilla et al
as 1:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
Ashunte Smith
Defendant:
Damian Padilla, S. Mazza, Tonya Bowser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDougald v. May et al
as 3:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Jerone McDougald
Defendant:
Harold May, Mr. Walters, Major Mr. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2022cv02469
Plaintiff:
Milous Brown
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Ernie L Moore, Brian J Niceswanger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Flowers v. Barcus et al
as 2:2022cv02196
Plaintiff:
Lamuel S. Flowers
Defendant:
Lisa Barcus, Sgt. Bob Avery, C.O. Everhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchem v. Singh, et al
as 1:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Zearl L. Mitchem, Jr.
Defendant:
Baljit Singh, Brown Realty, NBR Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Mahlman et al
as 1:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Michael DeAndre Brown
Defendant:
Linnea Mahlman, James Whitman, Roger Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. May et al
as 3:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Marquez B. Perry
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, DWO Hobbs, Major Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Willis v. ODRC (Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections) et al
as 2:2022cv01823
Plaintiff:
Domanshay Willis
Defendant:
ODRC (Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections), Officer C. Garvey, Officer Hammonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
