Cases 41 - 50 of 382
(PC) Roberts v. Newsom et al
as 1:2021cv00506
Defendant:
Muhammad Farooq, California Institution for Men, Conrad Delgadillo and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ennis v. California State Prison - Sacramento et al
as 2:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Ennis
Defendant:
Aubert, A. Herrera, Pehhe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) McCardie v. California State Prison Corcoran
as 1:2020cv01623
Defendant:
California State Prison Corcoran
Plaintiff:
Freddie McCardie and Freddy McCardie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCardie v. California State Prison, Corcoran
as 3:2020cv07729
Defendant:
California State Prison, Corcoran
Plaintiff:
Freddie McCardie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Weaver v. California State Prison Lancaster et al
as 2:2020cv09547
Plaintiff:
Willie Weaver
Defendant:
Second Watch Warden, Assist Ward and California State Prison Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Nava v. California State Superior Court et al
as 2:2020cv09045
Defendant:
Lt. Grant, Mark Meza, Sgt. Edge and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Nava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Cardenas v. California State
as 4:2020cv06401
Petitioner:
Danny Cardenas, Jr.
Respondent:
California State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Cardenas v. California State
as 2:2020cv01694
Petitioner:
Danny Cardenas, Jr.
Respondent:
California State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jerome Paul Wilson v. California State Prison Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2020cv07687
Defendant:
A. Kittner, Secretary of Cal. Dept. of Corr. and Reh., James Tilton and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Paul Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Roberts v. California State Prison Sacramento
as 2:2020cv01068
Plaintiff:
David Roberts and David Nathaniel Roberts
Defendant:
California State Prison Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
