Cases 41 - 50 of 195
Homer Gable v. Warden, et al
as 18-10593
Petitioner - Appellant:
HOMER A. GABLE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Reynolds v. Georgia Dept of Corrections
as 4:2017cv00269
Petitioner:
Dewayne Lebron Reynolds
Respondent:
Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Kevin Faulkner v. Warden, et al
as 17-14974
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN WAYNE FAULKNER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jamil Alamin v. Warden, et al
as 17-14865
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMIL ABDULLAH ALAMIN
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Stanley Oliver v. Glenn Johnson, et al
as 17-14288
Petitioner - Appellant:
STANLEY JAMES OLIVER
Respondent - Appellee:
GLENN JOHNSON and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC, et al
as 17-13387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, JAMES MCMILLAN, Unit Manager, ROBERT JONES, General Counsel and others
Nathaniel Griggs v. Warden, et al
as 17-12976
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHANIEL GRIGGS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Antonio Robinson v. Governor of Georgia, et al
as 17-12791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AUGUSTA SMP WARDEN, GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA and others
Herman Bright v. Commissioner, Georgia Departme
as 17-12648
Petitioner - Appellant:
HERMAN BRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
James Phillips, Jr. v. Governor, et al
as 17-12501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MAUNEL PHILLIPS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR, State of Georgia, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DOOLY STATE PRISON and others
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
