Cases 41 - 50 of 348
(PC) Akbar v. Lundy et al
as 2:2023cv01335
Plaintiff:
Hamed Akbar
Defendant:
Lundy, Campbell, Timmens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Lancaster v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 2:2023cv05122
Petitioner:
Andrew Lancaster
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Dao v. Campbell et al
as 2:2023cv01242
Plaintiff:
Cuong Huy Dao
Defendant:
Dustin Campbell, Carlos Rios, L. Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hill v. Corcoran State Prison et al
as 1:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
D'Vaughn Cortez Hill
Defendant:
Corcoran State Prison and T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrell Ainsworth v. Jeff Macombre et al
as 2:2023cv04263
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Ainsworth
Defendant:
Jeff Macombre, Trent Allen, Tammy L. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harrison v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Shaun R Harrison
Defendant:
Tammy L. Campbell and Jeffery Macomber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Valencia v. C.D.C.R., et al.
as 1:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Valencia
Defendant:
C.D.C.R., P.I.A., Tammy Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dow v. Campbell
as 3:2023cv02585
Petitioner:
LaCarl M Dow and LaCarl M. Dow
Respondent:
Warden and Warden Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alex Juarez v. Campbell
as 2:2023cv03910
Petitioner:
Alex Juarez
Respondent:
Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Campbell v. Bell et al
as 2:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dantel Campbell
Defendant:
A. Bell and Jeremy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
