Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Lucas v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
Joshua O. Lucas
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Aaron Goldstein and Carl C. Danberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00129
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Mary Moody, Carl C. Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnas Ortiz v. Joseph Biden, III, et al
as 11-1238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNAS ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, III, ATTY GEN DE, CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner, Dept. of Corrections and others
Stinson et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nevone Stinson
Defendant:
G. Williams , Allen Pedrick , R. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Williams et al
as 1:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
G. Williams , Allen Pedrick , R. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00031
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Phil Morgan , Ann Downing , Politi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00105
Defendant:
Phil Morgan , Ann Downing , Politi and others
Plaintiff:
Joe F. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery Simms v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 11-1060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY ALONZO SIMMS
Defendant - Appellee:
PERRY PHELPS, Warden, CARL C. DANBERG, Comm. and ATTY GEN DE
Cooke v. Moody et al
as 1:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Moody , R. Charles and Carl C. Danberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Parkell v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 10-4754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD D. PARKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of Prisons, in his individual and offical capacities, PERRY PHELPS, in his individual and official capacities, DAVID PIERCE, in his individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
