Cases 41 - 50 of 466
Carter v. United States Postal Service, et al.
as 5:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Ellery Carter
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. USA
as 4:2023cv00441
Petitioner:
Terry Ray Carter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Carter v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00822
Petitioner:
Ellery Carter
Respondent:
Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carter v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00803
Petitioner:
Ellery Carter
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carter v. Salazar, et al.
as 5:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Ellery Carter
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. United States Of America
as 1:2023cv00724
Petitioner:
Brandon Carter
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Panus et al v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Petitioner:
Justin Panus, Matthew Baker, Scott Zirus and others
Respondent:
Patrick L O'Daniel, Derrelynn Perryman, Larry D. Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00765
Petitioner:
Ellery Carter
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carter v. Unknown Defendants
as 5:2023cv00598
Plaintiff:
Ellery Carter
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. United States Of America
as 1:2023cv00528
Petitioner:
Lavante Carter
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
