Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Decoteau v. Kenney
as 4:2014cv03166
Petitioner:
Christopher Decoteau
Respondent:
Michael Kenney
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Decoteau v. Houston et al
as 4:2014cv03165
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Decoteau
Defendant:
Christine Ferguson, Robert Houston, Michael Kinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. USA
as 8:2013cv00380
Petitioner:
Christopher Scott
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cummings v. USA
as 4:2013cv03150
Petitioner:
Christopher Cummings
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Zimmerman v. State of Nebraska
as 4:2012cv03246
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Petitioner:
Christopher Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2012cv03193
Defendant:
Gengony Abbott, Keith C. Allensten, Jr., Lanet S. Asmussen and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Britten et al
as 4:2011cv03017
Defendant:
Jerry Bell, Fred Britten, Christopher Connelly and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Decoteau v. Sabatka-Rine
as 4:2008cv03146
Petitioner:
Christopher L. Decoteau
Respondent:
Diane Sabatka-Rine
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dugan v. Singpiel
as 4:2007cv03169
Petitioner:
Michael D. Dugan
Respondent:
Christopher Singpiel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dancer v. Washington et al
as 8:2007cv00054
Plaintiff:
Christopher K. Dancer
Defendant:
Mel Washington and Douglas County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
