Cases 41 - 50 of 68
CLIFFORD, JR. v. KERESTES et al
as 5:2013cv06659
Petitioner:
RANSOM CLIFFORD, JR.
Respondent:
KERESTES, PA. BOARD OF PROBATION PAROLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WORTHINGTON v. COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON et al
as 5:2013cv06292
Plaintiff:
HENRY F. WORTHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON , EASTON PA, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. PARKER et al
as 5:2013cv04260
Petitioner:
RANDY CARTER
Respondent:
JACK PARKER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PA. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MERRITT v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2013cv00898
Petitioner:
ROBERT MERRITT
Respondent:
TODD BUSKIRK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FARRELL v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2012cv04177
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DARYL FARRELL
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON, COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, CITY OF EASTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON et al
as 5:2012cv03202
Plaintiff:
DARREN JACKSON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON , TODD L. BUSKIRK , MICHEAL BATEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBBS v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2012cv02965
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH COBBS
Defendant:
TODD L. BUSKIRK, PRIME CARE MEDICAL +, AMILLIA CAPPUDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. ROYAL et al
as 5:2011cv07485
Petitioner:
RANDY CARTER
Respondent:
TERRY ROYAL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PA. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2011cv05774
Petitioner:
TERIK WILLIAMS
Respondent:
TODD L. BUSKIRK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCOTT et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 5:2011cv03282
Petitioner:
ROBERT SCOTT
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
