Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Hernandez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv01190
Plaintiff:
Isaac Felipe Hernandez
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala v. Livingston et al
as 6:2016cv01144
Plaintiff:
Jesus Ayala
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, David G Gutierrez and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Livingston et al
as 6:2016cv01105
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Pierce
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, David G Gutierrez and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Thaler
as 5:2016cv00142
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
David G. Harris
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hickey v. McComis
as 4:2015cv00047
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Steve Allen Hickey
Respondent:
David G. McComis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hickey v. McComis
as 4:2015cv00040
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Steven Allen Hickey
Respondent:
Warden David G. McComis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hickey v. McComis
as 4:2015cv00571
Petitioner:
Steven Allen Hickey
Respondent:
David G. McComis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hickey v. McComis
as 4:2015cv00567
Petitioner:
Steve Allen Hickey
Respondent:
David G. McComis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conner v. Stephen et al
as 1:2014cv00498
Plaintiff:
Stacy L Conner
Defendant:
William Stephen, Michael A Roesler, Darren B Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schery v. Justice et al
as 1:2012cv00186
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Schery
Defendant:
David G. Justice, Dwight Sims, GEO Group Inc Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
