Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Alaska
Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Stoltenberg v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00171
Plaintiff: Edwin Allen Stoltenberg
Defendant: State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Dean Williams, Shannon McCloud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahle v. Department of Correction et al
as 3:2016cv00276
Plaintiff: Gerald Mahle
Defendant: Department of Correction and Lapinskas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Alaska Department of Corrections
as 3:2016cv00268
Plaintiff: Brian F. Hall
Defendant: Alaska Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torrence v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00114
Plaintiff: Patrick Harrold Torrence
Defendant: Department of Corrections, Beardsley and Demetz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tholson v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00086
Plaintiff: Leon-Michael: Tholson
Defendant: State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Jason Marvel, Tonia Enyard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morena v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00060
Plaintiff: Harry Morena
Defendant: Department of Corrections and Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. AK. Department of Correctional et al.
as 3:2016cv00018
Plaintiff: Alvin Roy Johnson
Defendant: AK. Department of Correctional, Palmer Correctional Centers and Personal Property Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torrence v. Greenland et al
as 3:2016cv00002
Plaintiff: Patrick Harrold Torrence
Defendant: Greenland, Leonard, Forrester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torrence v. Department of Correction et al
as 3:2015cv00263
Plaintiff: Patrick Harrold Torrence
Defendant: Department of Correction, Hutchison, Beardsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milazzo v. Conant et al
as 3:2015cv00230
Plaintiff: Adam Milazzo
Defendant: John Conant , Chynoweth , Bialka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?