Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Carroll v. Ballou et al
as 6:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Stacy W. Carroll
Defendant:
Dan Ballou and Janie .
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. The Sporting News et al
as 4:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
The Sporting News, Whitney Shaw, Ray Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Clymer et al
as 5:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
Leroy Parker
Defendant:
Craig Z. Clymer, Van Newberry, Dan Boaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Stallard et al
as 6:2010cv00043
Plaintiff:
Verdell Kennedy, Jr.
Defendant:
Curt Stallard, B. J. Burkhart, Geona Snelling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe et al v. Ballou et al
as 6:2009cv00372
Plaintiff:
Willie Lowe
Defendant:
Dan Ballou, Allen Trimble, Motoka Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Lundy et al
as 6:2009cv00319
Plaintiff:
Willie Lowe
Defendant:
Lowell Lundy, Allen C. Trimble and Dan Ballou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Ballou et al
as 6:2009cv00183
Plaintiff:
Willie Lowe
Defendant:
Dan Ballou, Allen C. Trimble and Matoka Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Field & Stream Magazine et al
as 1:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Field & Stream Magazine, Jonas Bonnier, Tony Snow and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. The Indianapolis Star et al
as 3:2009cv00278
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
The Indianapolis Star, Gannett Newspaper, Michael G. Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blevins v. Thompson et al
as 0:2008cv00122
Plaintiff:
Jason Blevins
Defendant:
Ladonna Thompson, Dan Hittepole, Paul Holbrook and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
