Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Lumumba v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
Askari Danso M.S. Lumumba
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Joseph W. Walters, David Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNair v. VADOC Western Regional et al
as 7:2022cv00442
Plaintiff:
Evan Lee McNair
Defendant:
VADOC Western Regional, Wallens Ridge State Prison, Red Onion State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AlBritton v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon AlBritton
Defendant:
David Anderson, Kimberly Phipps and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth v. Anderson
as 3:2022cv00426
Petitioner:
Terrence Mack Booth
Respondent:
David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. Sturgill et al
as 7:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
M.D. Sturgill, K. Delk, Michael McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, David Robinson, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Amber Stanley, K.P. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Sturgill et al
as 7:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
M.D. Sturgill, T. Dowell, M. Vaughan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Sturgill et al
as 7:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
M.D. Sturgill, Sherri Richardson, J.S. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Phifer et al
as 7:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
M.D. Sturgill, Phifer, Michael McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
