Cases 41 - 50 of 1,814
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU Mr. King, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. Hidalgo et al
as 4:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Kevin Shepherd
Defendant:
Lina Hidalgo, Adrian Garcia, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00344
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cole v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division et al
as 4:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Luther Elvis Cole
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Sayers et al
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
GiorGio Taylor
Defendant:
Ethan Sayers, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. John Doe 7:24-CV-26-O
as 7:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Deunverelle L. Jackson and Deunjerelle L. Jackson
Defendant:
John Doe 7:24-CV-26-O, Katherine Rushing and Myriah Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newman et al v. Smith County, Texas et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brian Newman, Latosha Newman, Joyce Newman and others
Defendant:
Smith County, Texas, Sheriff Larry R Smith, John Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
